Friday, January 28, 2005

Jerusalem Post Oped

The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

The future of denial


Standing in the biting cold of Auschwitz-Birkenau, surrounded by aging Holocaust survivors, it struck me that such a gathering will not be possible much longer. We, who have grown up surrounded by survivors - as teachers, neighbors, and friends' parents - can easily forget how important their personal testimony is.

When today's children are old enough to really understand this momentous event, there will be virtually no one around to speak in the first person singular and to say "This is my story, this is what happened to me."

Many people worry that when the voice of the witness is lost, Holocaust deniers will find it easier to spread their lies. This fear suggests that without the survivors, there will not be enough evidence to "prove" what happened at Auschwitz. Though a survivor can speak with the unique voice of the eyewitness, this fear is unfounded.

This was brought into stark relief during my legal battle in the UK when I was compelled to defend myself against charges of libel brought by Holocaust denier David Irving. Without relying on survivors as witnesses, we amassed a massive cache of documentary, testimonial, and material evidence about Auschwitz.

With the assistance of a gifted team of expert historians, my legal team proved that Irving's and, by extension, other deniers' claims about Auschwitz were a tissue of lies. Judge Charles Gray of the High Court of Justice emphasized this in his 355-page judgment. He said that the evidence conclusively demonstrated that Irving's claims that Auschwitz-Birkenau was not a death camp fell far short of the standard to be expected of a conscientious historian.

Gray declared that the "cumulative effect" of the documentary evidence for the genocidal operation of the gas chambers at Auschwitz was "considerable," "mutually corroborative," and "striking[ly]... consistent." He concluded that "no objective, fair-minded historian would have serious cause to doubt" the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz. The four different judges who heard Irving's appeals agreed.

As a result of this lawsuit - brought against me by this man whom the court declared a denier, anti-Semite, and racist - virtually all denial arguments as they stood until July 2001, the date of the final appeal, were exposed as completely bogus.

This sweeping and unrelenting dismissal constituted a serious setback for the deniers. In the Western world, this blatant form of Holocaust denial has currently been relegated, by and large, to fringes of the political spectrum.

Other forms of denial - declaring President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to be Hitler's equivalent or denouncing Israeli soldiers as Nazis - are still prevalent. These charges are a form of Holocaust denial because, irrespective of how one feels about the United States' or Israel's policies, comparing them to the actions of the Third Reich is a complete distortion of the truth.

THERE IS, however, a region of the world where David Irving-style wholesale denial is alive and kicking: the Arab world. Abdel Aziz Rantisi, who served as the "general commander" of Hamas until his assassination in April 2004, expressed his outrage at the Zionists' success in spreading the propaganda of the "false Holocaust" and claimed that that no one has clarified how the "false gas chambers worked." Maintaining a consistent level of historical accuracy, Rantisi decried the fact that David Irving "was sued" because of his Holocaust denial.

In August 2004 Muhammad Al-Zurqani, the former editor-in-chief of Al-Liwaa Al-Islami, the Egyptian government daily, declared on Egyptian television that "the Holocaust is a big lie." Author Rif'at Sayyed Ahmad, who had written an article in the daily, entitled "The Lie about the Burning of the Jews," was appearing on the same show. As soon as Al-Zurqani made his claim, he chimed in, "Of course."

Though the Egyptian information minister denounced such views, the Egyptian Journalists Association defended them as being based on "historical research."

In his recent book The Lost Territories of the Republic, Georges Bensoussan describes the current situation in many French schools attended by large numbers of Muslims. These students frequently dismiss their teachers' attempts to teach about the Holocaust with the declaration: "This is an invention." In response, some French teachers have reportedly backed off from teaching about the Holocaust.

There has been a tendency to dismiss this phenomenon as of matter of lesser concern because it comes from "disaffected" Muslim and Arab youth. Most of these students, however, are the French-born children or grandchildren of immigrants.

Holocaust denial is not the only form of false history that is gaining ground in the Arab and Muslim world. Increasingly, the myths of the blood libel and of world Jewish domination have spread.

In 2003, the manuscript museum at the famed Alexandria Library briefly exhibited The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (it withdrew them in response to world protests). The Egyptian weekly Al-Usbu interviewed Dr. Yousef Ziedan, the director of manuscripts at the library, in conjunction with the exhibition.

Regarding the Holocaust, the weekly quoted the museum official as saying, "An analysis of samples from the purported gas chambers has proven that these were sterilization chambers, without a sufficient quantity of cyanide to kill." He also declared that "Had Hitler wanted to annihilate the Jews of Europe, he would have." Strikingly, fundamentalist Muslims have adopted the traditional anti-Semitic imagery of the Christian world.

While there are those Arab intellectuals who have decried Holocaust denial by their fellow Arabs, their views do not seem to be in the ascendancy. The phenomenon of Arab and Muslim Holocaust denial cannot be ignored or dismissed as "simply" an expression of the Arab-Israeli conflict. These attacks are not found only at the extreme ends of the political spectrum. Moreover, it is hard to erase these notions once they have taken root, particularly in a generation of young people.

The prevalence of Arab Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism are a stark indication that despite the fact that a myriad of heads of state and their delegations gathered yesterday at Birkenau, history - particularly inconvenient history - remains a battleground.

The writer, a member of the official American delegation to the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Liberation of Auschwitz, is author most recently of History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving.


Anonymous said...

An excellent article! I was particularly glad to see your comments on the disturbing ascendancy and prevalence of denial in the Arab world - observations that were sadly lacking in all the other commemoration coverage I've read. Although, their (expected but) conspicuous absence at the UN commemoration was certainly very telling. Anne Bayefsky has a well worth reading article on the UN day, btw:

Am looking forward to reading your book (which, unfortunately, evidently won't be available in Canada until the end of Feb.)


Anonymous said...

Is it true that the new Palestinian Prime Minister, Mohammoud Abbas - Abu Mazen - received his PhD from the University of Moscow, on Holocaust Denial?

Deborah Lipstadt said...

In the thesis Abbas said that the number of Jews who had been killed was no more than a million. This is a classic denial argument. He subsequently said that he would not have made that statement today. This has been accepted as a retraction by most people.

And yes he was studying in Moscow.

David H Lippman said...

Unbelievably powerful article...I wish I could share your optimism on the defeat of Holocaust denial in the Western world, but the appalling ravings of Holocaust deniers are still drenching the World Wide Web. I got five e-mails in one day from a Holocaust denial website, all quoting Faurisson, Butz, and Weber, as part of a mass mailing. The discussion groups of The History Channel are dominated by pseudonymous neo-Nazis, who make use of the usual tools to squelch the truth. And sadly, David Irving still has his web page and his of them even sniped at my web page, a day-by-day history of World War II. It amazes me that people of intelligence can believe such appalling garbage...but then, people of intelligence still grab their newspapers and go straight to the Horoscope.

hockey hound said...

Dear Dr. Lipstadt,
You write, "The phenomenon of Arab and Muslim Holocaust denial..." Also, "The prevalence of Arab Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism..."
I will never understand why the term "Arab" is used -- even by scholars -- instead of "Muslim." In point of fact (in my opinion), there would be no so-called Arab anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial were it not for the insalubrious religion of Islam. The fact that Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism exists in prevalent measure in "Arab" countries has absolutely nothing to do with the Arabs as a people and everything to do with the religion of Islam with which the Arabs, as a people, have been inculcated with for centuries.

Holocaust denial is far from innocuous and surely does not give free rein to its intended victims, namely Jews. Therefore, why should its opponents, Jew and Gentile alike, confuse and garble from exposure the original source of this anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in the Arab world, which is Islam?
Also, I can't resist telling you here that I think you are a modern-day hero.
I am presently reading your History On Trial. I was at Jim Keegstra's trial in Alberta, Canada, and so I can relate minutely with how these sciolistic madmen endeavor to pass themselves off as legitimate historians.
Yeah, you're a Devorah alright! All the best, Dr. Lipstadt!

A Noachide friend,
Michael Devolin