tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10183882.post7208538793836675705..comments2024-02-16T22:14:46.997-05:00Comments on Deborah Lipstadt’s Blog: Creative Loafing, Atlanta's "alternative" paper attacks meDeborah Lipstadthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10459645888846468575noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10183882.post-73222587839814681372007-04-07T16:31:00.000-04:002007-04-07T16:31:00.000-04:00Dr. Lipstadt: Thanks for your thoughtful response ...Dr. Lipstadt: Thanks for your thoughtful response to John Sugg’s column. I do want to correct one point regarding your post, however. I am the editor of Creative Loafing. John is a senior editor. His duties include writing a weekly column.<BR/><BR/>You may have missed my own earlier take on Jimmy Carter’s book, which was critical of it on many of the same points that yours was. That column, which you’ll find at http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A181154, was published in early January in response to what I believed to be an anti-Semitic column defending Carter published by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.<BR/><BR/>Neither my column nor John’s represents the editorial position of Creative Loafing, however. I understand that the regularity of John’s column may leave some to perceive otherwise. But, given the headline of your post, I did want to make that distinction.<BR/><BR/>As for David Lieberman's speculation that we took the article down, it's easily reachable through the normal links. It wasn't on the front page simply because David was looking for it during the next week's cycle. <BR/><BR/>Thanks again for the thoughtful letter,<BR/>Ken Edelstein<BR/>Editor<BR/>Creative Loafing/Atlanta<BR/>atlanta.creativeloafing.comKeneeeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16694337204854144891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10183882.post-18377600494380937582007-03-23T11:04:00.000-04:002007-03-23T11:04:00.000-04:00Interestingly, the column isn't listed from the we...Interestingly, the column isn't listed from the website's front page, although the printable version remains active by direct link. Maybe Sugg is embarrassed to have been so flamboyantly wrong. He ought to be.<BR/><BR/>David LiebermanDavid Liebermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15635668223847728295noreply@blogger.com